Official us defcon level tv#

The first country to push the button will destroy human civilization. In a nuclear world, is it possible Putin and/or Biden can control the outcome of events they set in motion? Are we willing to take the chance and find out?There is no such thing as a limited nuclear war. History has taught us that even though the warring factions may be rational actors, unexpected miscalculations can lead to catastrophic outcomes. Martial missteps and nuclear close calls are real and have nearly led to an unholy nuclear mess. The escalation of Western involvement in Ukraine further expands the possibility of calamity and misunderstanding, which could trigger military exchanges that could lead to catastrophe of historic proportions. If both powers are mirroring the strategy, he says, “I think you can figure out that this could lead to a rapid misunderstanding and the release of nuclear weapons.” What if the Russians were to adopt the same doctrine? Ritter says it could lead to catastrophe. might escalate the conflict in Ukraine to force the Russians to de-escalate.

has a nuclear doctrine of “escalate to de-escalate” – the U.S. Marine intelligence officer who served in the former Soviet Union, notes that only the U.S. Those who are using nuclear blackmail against us should know that the wind rose can turn around.” Nuclear Deterrence: Escalate to De-escalate

Official us defcon level tv#

One Washington insider has stated that Putin would approve the use of nuclear weapons “if he perceived an existential threat to the Russian state or regime.” Putin, in turn, has told a national TV audience, “ur independence and freedom will be defended… by all the systems available to us. The difference, in this case, is the possibility of nuclear warfare.

is, however, fighting a proxy war with Russia in Ukraine that could drag on, similar to the Vietnam and Afghanistan wars. and Russia possess enough thermonuclear weaponry to reduce much of the world to smoldering, glutinous rubble. Depending on the pathway to escalation – escalate to win, escalate to not lose, inadvertently escalate – he says each “holds the potential to bring the United States into the fighting or lead Russia to use nuclear weapons, and possibly both.”The U.S. is already fighting in the Third World War, punctuating the contention, “We’ve been in this for a long time, and we’ve failed to recognize it.” American political scientist and international relations scholar John Mearsheimer might not disagree. In the article, Fiona Hill, a one-time official at the UN Security Council who specializes in European and Russian affairs, expressed her concern that the U.S. Just before Politico’s dire forecast, New Yorker staffer Susan Glasser posted a piece arguing that Putin’s continued and escalated actions in Ukraine were forcing Washington’s hand. There are those who would suggest we’re caught in an epic WWIII-like undertaking. In October, Politico, a respected voice in politics, policy and power, noted, “the probability of the use of tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine has risen from 1-5 percent at the start of the war to 20-25 percent today.” The world has not been so publicly reminded of the possibility of nuclear confrontation since the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962. Russia’s assault on Ukraine has increased the risk of a wider war between nuclear powers, and the possible deployment of nuclear weapons. The West’s efforts to punish Russia for its invasion of Ukraine have neither stopped the fighting nor compelled Moscow to reconsider the ongoing war.

President Joseph Biden has since declared the world is “faced with the prospect of Armageddon.” UN Secretary General António Guterres recently said we are “just one misunderstanding, one miscalculation away from nuclear annihilation.” Russian President Vladimir Putin has ordered his country’s nuclear forces put on “ special alert.” U.S. As the unrelenting war in Ukraine grinds continuously and more deeply into the proxy war it has been from the start, another danger lurks: nuclear war.